THE ORIGIN OF EPISODIC ACCRETION BURSTS IN THE EARLY STAGES OF STAR FORMATION
E. I. Vorobyov1,2, Shantanu Basu1
Preprint of paper which appeared in ApJ Letters*
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario,
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada; vorobyov@astro.uwo.ca, basu@astro.uwo.ca
2Institute of Physics, Stachki 194, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
* Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2005, ApJ, 633, L137
ABSTRACT
We study numerically the evolution of rotating cloud cores, from the collapse of a magnetically supercritical core to the formation of a protostar and the development of a protostellar disk during the main accretion phase. We find that the disk quickly becomes unstable to the development of a spiral structure similar to that observed recently in AB Aurigae. A continuous infall of matter
from the protostellar envelope makes the protostellar disk unstable, leading to spiral arms and the formation of dense protostellar/protoplanetary clumps within them. The growing strength of spiral arms and ensuing redistribution of mass and angular momentum creates a strong centrifugal disbalance in the disk and triggers bursts of mass accretion during which the dense protostellar/protoplanetary clumps fall onto the central protostar.
These episodes of clump infall may manifest themselves as episodes of vigorous
accretion rate (≥ 10−4 M⊙ yr−1) as is observed in
FU Orionis variables.
Between these accretion bursts, the protostar is characterized by a low
accretion rate (< 10−6 M⊙ yr−1). During the phase
of episodic accretion, the mass of the protostellar disk remains
less than the mass of the protostar.
Subject headings: accretion, accretion disks — hydrodynamics — instabilities — ISM : clouds — MHD — stars: formation
1. Introduction
In our present view of low-mass star formation, a protostar in the early stages
of mass assembly (in the so-called class 0 and class I phases) is surrounded by a
protostellar disk which is in turn deeply embedded in an infalling envelope
left over from the collapse of a rotating prestellar cloud core.
The observed low luminosity of these protostars implies a low mass accretion rate,
and hence a long lifetime in order to achieve typical final stellar masses;
however, this is inconsistent with the
number of known class 0 and class I objects (Kenyon et. al. 1990).
A possible explanation is that the protostellar accretion proceeds in two
co-existing phases (Kenyon & Hartmann 1995). Accretion from the envelope onto the protostellar disk takes
place in a fairly uniform (though generally declining in time) manner, whereas
accretion from the protostellar disk onto the central protostar occurs
primarily in short (and infrequently observed) but
powerful episodes during which 0.01−0.1
M⊙ can be accreted. These
episodes of vigorous accretion

≥ 10
−4 M⊙ yr
−1
manifest themselves as FU Orionis variables (FU Ori). Between these accretion
bursts, a typical class 0/class I protostar is characterized by a low
accretion rate

∼ 10
−7 M⊙ yr
−1.
The nature of FU Ori disk accretion bursts has been widely debated.
For instance, close encounters in binary systems may cause a strong perturbation
in protostellar disks and drive high accretion rates during a relatively
short period Bonnell. This mechanism requires rather eccentric
orbits of binary systems and obviously fails to explain FU Ori outbursts in
isolated protostars.
An alternative idea is that the thermal instability (namely, the steep dependence of
the disk opacity on temperature between ∼ 3000 K and ∼ 10
4 K)
of the optically thick innermost regions of circumstellar disks
triggers FU Ori eruptions (Lin & Papaloizou 1985; Clarke et al. 1990; Bell & Lin 1994). Most thermal instability models
exploit the α-prescription of Shakura, who suggested that
the disk effective viscosity is proportional to its temperature; an increase in disk temperature
causes a higher rate of mass accretion due to an elevated viscous mass transfer and vice versa.
Unfortunately, many aspects of this mechanism of FU Ori outbursts are completely
dependent upon the unknown value of disk effective viscosity, which determines the timescale
for outbursts.
It is known from theoretical and numerical studies that protostellar disks may be
subject to the development
of global spiral instabilities.
For instance, Laughlin & Bodenheimer (1994) have studied the nonaxisymmetric evolution
of protostellar disks and found that they are susceptible to a series of spiral
instabilities, with the fastest growing modes being the one-armed (
m=1) and
two-armed (
m=2) patterns.
Recent numerical simulations of star cluster formation (Bate et al. 2003) confirmed that the protostellar disks formed
around protostars were gravitationally unstable and prone to the development
of spiral density waves.
Simulations of marginally unstable protoplanetary disks
show the formation of flocculent and clumpy spiral structure,
suggesting a possible transient rise in the mass accretion rate
associated with clump infall (Boss 2003).
Mejia et al. (2005) have also reported three-dimensional simulations
which demonstrate a single FU-Ori-like outburst associated with
the growth of spiral structure in an isolated protoplanetary disk.
Recent observations do reveal a flocculent spiral structure in
the protostellar disk of AB Aurigae (Fukagawa et al. 2004; Corder et al. 2004).
In this Letter, we present the first model of
cloud core collapse which self-consistently
generates multiple accretion bursts that can be identified with
FU Ori eruptions. The protostellar disk in our model is formed as a
result of the collapse and is not isolated from the parent core envelope.
The details of the numerical model are described in §
2.
The results of simulations are presented in §
3. Our main
conclusions are summarized in §
4.
2. Model description
We model the collapse of a rotating cloud core which is threaded by a
frozen-in magnetic field with spatially uniform mass-to-flux ratio.
The magnetic field effect is comparable to but weaker than gravity,
so that the core is magnetically supercritical. A magnetically-diluted
gravitational collapse ensues. Our initial core model is
a good approximation to the supercritical cores that result from the
fragmentation of magnetized clouds that are initially either
critical/subcritical or supercritical (e.g., Basu 1997; Basu & Ciolek 2004).
We follow the collapse through the prestellar collapse phase and into the
accretion phase which sees the development of a protostar and a
protostellar disk. The thin-disk approximation is used in the form
appropriate for a supercritical core with
mass-to-flux ratio μ that is spatially uniform (Basu 1997; Nakamura & Hanawa 1997; Shu & Li 1997). The magnetic field pressure enhances the gas pressure and the magnetic tension dilutes the effect of gravity.
The disk is symmetric about the midplane,
with a vertical magnetic field component Bz inside the disk and
both vertical and tangential components outside it. The material external to the disk
is current-free (j = 0). We characterize the field strength
by the parameter
α ≡ μ−1 = Bz/ (2 π √GΣ),
where Σ is the gas surface density; note α < 1 for a
supercritical core.
The magnetohydrodynamic equations we use are
written in the thin-disk approximation as
|
Σ |
|
= −∇ P − |
|
∇
Bz2 − (1−α2) Σ ∇ Φ,
(2) |
where v is the gas velocity in the disk plane, P is the
vertically integrated gas pressure,
and Φ is the gravitational potential.
Equation (2) contains the
Lagrangian derivative d/dt = ∂ /∂t + v · ∇.
We assume a two-component equation of state
P=
cs2Σ
+
cs2 Σ
cr (Σ/Σ
cr)
γ, where
cs is the isothermal speed of sound
and Σ
cr is the critical gas surface density above which
the disk becomes optically thick. This
equation of state allows for a smooth transition between the isothermal
and non-isothermal regimes during the collapse.
We use a canonical value of the critical gas volume density
ncr=10
11 cm
−3 (Larson 2003),
which is equivalent to Σ
cr=36.2 g cm
−2 for
the gas disk in vertical hydrostatic equilibrium.
In equation (
2), we assume a cloud scale height
Z=
cs2/(π
G Σ) for Σ≤ Σ
cr and
Z=
cs2/(π
GΣ
cr) for Σ > Σ
cr.
We adopt the ratio of specific heats γ = 7/5 for the optically
thick regime, appropriate for an adiabatic diatomic gas.
Equations (
1) and (
2) are numerically solved in polar
coordinates (
r,φ) using the method of finite differences with a time-explicit,
operator-split solution procedure
similar to that described by Stone and Norman in their ZEUS-2D code (Stone & Norman 1992).
The details of the code and results of the tests will be given in a follow-up
paper.
The numerical grid has 256×256 points, which are logarithmically spaced
in
r-direction allowing for a good resolution in the inner cloud regions.
The innermost grid point is located at 10 AU and the size of the first
adjacent cell is 0.3 AU.
The Truelove criterion (Truelove et al. 1998) is preserved throughout the simulations
– the size of grid cells is smaller than the Jeans length.
We introduce a “sink cell” at
r < 10 AU, which represents
the central protostar plus some circumstellar disk material, and impose a free inflow
inner boundary condition.
We assume that the matter is cycled through the circumstellar disk and onto
the protostar rapidly enough so that the mass infall
through the sink cell is at least proportional to the mass accretion
rate onto the protostar.
We impose the outer boundary condition such that the gravitationally bound
cloud has a constant mass and volume.
The gravitational potential of the cloud is evaluated numerically using the fast Fourier
transform (Binney & Tremaine 1987).
3. Results
We have studied many different initial cloud configurations and present here a
prototype magnetized (α = 0.45) rotating cloud with mass Mcl = 2.45 M⊙ and an
outer radius rout = 20000 AU. The cloud is composed
of molecular hydrogen with a 10% admixture of atomic helium and is initially
isothermal at T = 10 K (cs = 0.188 km s−1).
The initial surface density and angular velocity distributions are those
characteristic of a collapsing axisymmetric supercritical core (Basu 1997):
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
Here, Σ
0 = 3.5510
−2 g cm
−2 and Ω
0 = 0.5 km s
−1 pc
−1
are the central surface density and angular velocity, respectively.
We choose a value
r0 =
cs2/(1.5
G Σ
0), so that
r0 is comparable to the Jeans length of an isothermal sheet.
We mimic the slight nonaxisymmetry in more realistic models of core formation (Basu & Ciolek 2004) by substituting
r2 in Eq. (
3) with
r2 (cos
2φ/
a2 +
a2 sin
2φ), where the parameter
a = 0.98 denotes the
cloud oblateness.
The ratios of rotational, magnetic, and
thermal energies to the gravitational energy of the cloud are 0.4%, 30%, and 27.2%, respectively.
Thus, the initial cloud is gravitationally unstable. We emphasize that
our qualitative results are insensitive to the particular choice of initial conditions.
Figure 1: Periodic mass accretion outbursts.
The temporal evolution of
a) the mass accretion rate

(the black line)
and the Toomre parameter
Q (the red line) and
b) the
bolometric luminosity (the brown line)
and the normalized gravitational torque per unit mass Γ/Γ
max (the blue line). The horizontal axis shows the elapsed time since the formation of
the protostar.
The behavior of
M shows two distinct
phases. In the early phase,

slowly declines and tends to
approach a constant value. In the later phase, after the formation
of the protostellar disk at
t = 7700 yr, the mass accretion occurs in periodic
bursts.
The evolution of both
Q and Γ/Γ
max show a correlation with the accretion bursts.
Figure 2: A sequence of gas surface density images showing the evolution
of the protostellar disk after the formation of the protostar at
t = 0 yr. The
disk quickly becomes unstable and develops a spiral structure with
dominant
m = 2 and
m = 4 modes. Formation of dense protostellar/protoplanetary
clumps within the spiral arms is evident in most images. The numbers
in the left upper corner of each image show the elapsed time since
the formation of the protostar.
The cloud evolution is characterized by a slow initial gravitational
contraction and then a very rapid runaway collapse until the formation
of the central protostar.
The black line in Figure 1a shows two distinct phases in the temporal evolution of
the mass accretion rate
onto the protostar.
The early behavior of
is qualitatively
similar to that obtained in spherical collapse simulations (see e.g., Vorobyov & Basu 2005).
Accretion shows a very rapid increase to a maximum value of
=1.0 10−4 M⊙ yr−1
at t = 0 yr, when the
central protostar forms. Subsequently, there is a slow decline in
,
when the gas
is accreted directly onto the protostar from the inner envelope, which has
a relatively low specific angular momentum.
The second phase starts at t = 7700 yr when
the protostellar disk forms around the protostar due to the infall
of matter from the outer envelope, which has a higher specific angular momentum.
The mass of the protostar at this stage is approximately Ms = 0.4 M⊙.
The matter in the disk moves on nearly
circular orbits and most of it is far from the protostar.
Hence, the accretion rate
onto the protostar abruptly drops down to a negligible value.
A continuous infall of matter from the envelope makes
the protostellar disk unstable to the development of spiral structure shown in Fig. 2
and induces the formation of dense protostellar/protoplanetary clumps within
the arms. The even (m = 2,4) modes are dominant in this simulation, but the odd
(m = 1,3) modes are also excited in some simulations.
Spiral arms transport angular momentum outward and mass inward (Lynden-Bell & Kalnajs 1972). The
ensuing redistribution of mass
and angular momentum creates a strong centrifugal disbalance in the protostellar
disk and triggers bursts of mass accretion when dense
protostellar/protoplanetary clumps in the inner disk are driven into
the protostar (see below for an animation of the disk evolution, or go here to download the animation).
Animation of the disk evolution.
During this process, the mass in the protostellar disk
remains somewhat less than the mass of the protostar.
The episodes of clump infall can manifest themselves as very short
(≤ 100 yr) but vigorous (

= [1−10] ×
10
−4 M⊙ yr
−1) accretion bursts as is clearly seen in
Fig.
1.
During the accretion bursts, 0.01−0.05
M⊙ of gas is accreted
and the accretion luminosity may by grow many orders of magnitude.
The duration of the intervening
quiescent accretion phase with

= (1−10) × 10
−7 M⊙ yr
−1 is usually (1−3) × 10
3 yr. The frequency
of bursts decreases with time and the number of bursts may amount
to 15-30. The brown line in Fig.
1b shows
a luminosity
Lbol =
G Ms 
/
Rc (it is assumed to derive entirely from the disk accretion), where
Rc = 4
R⊙ is the radius of the protostar (Masunaga & Inutsuka 2000). Our
Lbol is an upper limit to the expected observable bolometric luminosity.
It is evident that the episodes of clump infall lead to a dramatic increase
in
Lbol (by a factor of up to 2000 as compared to a quiescent period)
and the protostar may reveal itself as an FU Orionis variable.
Our calculations of the approximate Toomre parameter
Q =
cs Ω/(π
GΣ)
(Toomre 1981) and the total gravitational torque per unit
mass Γ, which is the
sum of the individual torques per unit mass (|∂Φ/∂φ|)
on all computational cells,
support the above scenario of episodic accretion.
The quantity
cs2 ≡
dP /
dΣ is the squared effective
sound speed.
The
Q parameter may serve as an approximate stability criterion – gas
disks are gravitationally unstable to local nonaxisymmetric perturbations
if
Q ≤ 1.5−1.7 (Nelson et al. 1998; Boss 1998), while Γ may roughly express the efficiency
of angular momentum and mass redistribution by spiral inhomogeneities
in the disk (Tomley et al. 1994). The Toomre parameter is calculated by averaging
cs, Ω, and Σ over all computational cells.
The red and blue lines in Fig.
1a and
1b show the evolution of
Q
and the normalized gravitational torque Γ/Γ
max after the protostellar disk formation, respectively. In the early phase of near
constant accretion,
the matter is directly accreted onto the protostar and
Q is much larger than unity.
When the protostellar disk forms, its density starts to grow due to accretion.
As a consequence, the Toomre parameter gradually decreases below the stability limit
Q ≈ 1.5 and reaches a minimum value at the time of the accretion burst.
This strongly suggests a causal link between the gravitational instabilities and
accretion bursts.
The behavior of Γ also shows a direct correlation with accretion
bursts. The gravitational torque gradually increases and reaches a maximum
value at the time of each accretion burst, indicating the growing efficiency
of inward mass transport before the burst.
We note that the strength of
the torque due to artificial viscosity (used in our Eulerian code to
smooth shocks) is at least an order of magnitude smaller
than the strength of the gravitational torque associated with spiral instabilities.
Thus, the artificial viscosity cannot be responsible for the accretion
bursts. After the burst, the mass of the protostellar disk decreases
and the growth of spiral instabilities becomes temporarily suppressed,
as indicated by high values of
Q (> 1.5) and a sharp decrease in Γ.
However, the continuous mass infall onto the disk from the envelope quickly
destabilizes the disk and the cycle repeats until most
of the envelope mass is accreted by the protostar.
Ambipolar diffusion, while not included in our model, is expected to
favor the formation of clumps and subsequent burst activity
by removing magnetic support. Indeed, a model with no magnetic
support (α = 0)
shows an increase in the frequency and amplitude of accretion bursts (Vorobyov
& Basu, in preparation).
Further magnetic effects such as magnetic braking (Krasnopolsky & Königl 2002)
and magnetorotational instability (Fromang et al. 2005) may become important
in the late accretion phase,
but can only be studied in a future three-dimensional model.
4. Conclusions
Rotating protostellar cores show two distinct phases in the temporal evolution of the mass accretion rate

onto the protostar. The early behavior of

is qualitatively similar to that obtained in
spherical collapse simulations. Accretion shows a very rapid increase to a maximum,
when the central protostar forms, and a subsequent slow decline, when the gas is accreted directly onto the protostar
from the inner envelope. The second phase starts when the protostellar disk forms around the protostar
due to the infall of matter from the outer envelope with higher specific angular momentum.
In this phase,

is characterized by very short (< 100 yr) but vigorous
(

= [1−10] × 10
−4 M⊙ yr
−1) accretion bursts,
which are intervened with longer periods (~ 10
3 yr) of quiescent accretion.
We have demonstrated that
the repeating accretion bursts reflect a basic
self-regulation mechanism that is inherent to self-gravitating
rotating protostellar disks.
We emphasize that it is the ongoing infall of matter from the
protostellar envelope that continually destabilizes the disk
and causes it to periodically dump significant amounts of matter
onto the protostar while transferring excess angular momentum to the
envelope.
The effect of additional support due to a frozen-in
supercritical magnetic field is to moderate the burst activity
but not suppress it.
Recent high resolution Hubble Space Telescope observations
of the central regions (≤ a few hundred pc) of Seyfert galaxies (Regan & Mulchaey 1999)
also reveal rich spiral structures. We suggest
that a self-regulation mechanism similar to that in our model
may operate on galactic scales
and be responsible for periodic nuclear activity in at least some
Seyfert galaxies.
This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada. EIV gratefully acknowledges support
from a CITA National Fellowship.
References
- [1]
-
Basu, S. 1997, ApJ, 485, 240
- [2]
-
Basu, S., & Ciolek, G. E. 2004, ApJ, 607, L39
- [3]
-
Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Bromm, V. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 577
- [4]
-
Bell, K. R., & Lin, D. N. C. 1994, ApJ, 427, 987
- [5]
-
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics,
(Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton), 96
- [6]
-
Bonnell, I., & Bastien, P. 1992, ApJ, 401, L31
- [7]
-
Boss, A. P. 1998, ApJ, 503, 923
- [8]
-
Boss, A. P. 2003, ApJ, 599, 577
- [9]
-
Clarke, C. J., Lin, D. N. C., & Pringle, J. E. 1990, MNRAS, 242, 439
- [10]
-
Corder, S., Eisner, J., & Sargent, A. 2005, ApJ, 622, 133
- [11]
-
Fromang, S., Balbus, S. A., Terquem, C., & De Villiers, J.-P. 2005,
, 616, 364
- [12]
-
Fukagawa, M., Hayashi, M., Tamura, M. et al. 2004, ApJ, 605, L53
- [13]
-
Kenyon, S. J., Hartmann, L. W., Strom, K. M., & Strom, S. E. 1990, AJ,
99, 869
- [14]
-
Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. W. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117
- [15]
-
Krasnopolsky, R., & Knigl, A. 2002, ApJ, 580, 987
- [16]
-
Larson, R. B. 2003, Rep. Prog. Phys., 66, 1651
- [17]
-
Laughlin, G., & Bodenheimer, P. 1994, ApJ, 436, 335
- [18]
-
Lin, D. N. C. & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II,
ed. D. C. Black, M. C. Matthews, Eds. (Univ. Ariz. Press, Tucson, 1985), 981
- [19]
-
Lynden-Bell, D., & Kalnajs, A. J. 1972, MNRAS, 157, 1
- [20]
-
Masunaga, H., & Inutsuka, S. 2000, ApJ, 531, 350
- [21]
-
Mejia, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Pickett, M. K., & Cai, K. 2005, ApJ, 619,
1098
- [22]
-
Nakamura, F., & Hanawa, T. 1997, ApJ, 480, 701
- [23]
-
Nelson, A. F., Benz, W., Adams, F. C., & Arnett, D. 1998, ApJ, 502, 342
- [24]
-
Regan, M. W., & Mulchaey, J. S. 1999, AJ, 117, 2676
- [25]
-
Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337
- [26]
-
Shu, F. H., & Li, Z.-Y. 1997, , 475, 251
- [27]
-
Stone, J. M., & Norman, M. L. 1992, ApJS, 80, 753
- [28]
-
Tomley, L., Steiman-Cameron, T. Y., & Cassen, P. 1994, ApJ, 422, 850
- [29]
-
Toomre, A. 1981, in The Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies, ed.
S. M. Fall, D. Lynden-Bell, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge), 111
- [30]
-
Truelove, J. K., Klein, R. I., McKee, C. F., Holliman II, J. H., Howell,
L. H., Greenough, J. A., & Woods, D. T. 1998, ApJ, 495, 821
- [31]
-
Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 675
This document was translated from LATEX by
HEVEA.